This week, I opened AnySwap with a more interesting goal than exchanging one pair. I wanted to model a portfolio rebalance that started with one USDC balance and produced three destination allocations: BTC, ETH, and SOL. Building the route in one session made the percentages feel like a portfolio decision instead of three unrelated swaps.

I tested the current July 2026 multi-exchange workflow and documented the allocation logic, wallets, and quote fields. The percentages below are an editorial example, not a claim that I funded this exact basket. A completed version should be published with the real execution receipt and transaction references.

Why did I choose BTC, ETH, and SOL?

I wanted a simple basket with three distinct native assets and three established ecosystems. BTC represented my Bitcoin allocation, ETH represented Ethereum, and SOL represented Solana. Starting from USDC made the percentages easier to think about because the input had a familiar dollar-denominated unit.

The current AnySwap multi-exchange documentation lists BTC, ETH, SOL, USDT, and USDC among the assets supported by its deeper-liquidity workflow. It also describes one input deposit being divided across multiple recipient rows.

My sample allocation was deliberately easy to audit:

The percentages are not investment advice. They are a clear example of how I translated one balance into a three-part plan.

What was different from making three separate swaps?

The main difference was coordination. With three independent orders, I would calculate each input amount, create each deposit, save three sets of records, and make sure the combined amounts matched my target allocation. In the multi-recipient form, I could see all three legs together and make the total equal 100 percent.

The documentation says the orchestrator accepts one deposit and handles the split across recipient wallets. That is the part I found most appealing. I could spend my attention on the portfolio structure rather than manually dividing the source balance before every order.

My setup sequence was:

1. Select USDC and its source network.
2. Enter the total amount intended for the rebalance.
3. Add one recipient row for BTC, one for ETH, and one for SOL.
4. Paste the matching native-network address into each row.
5. Set the allocations to 40, 35, and 25 percent.
6. Review the combined quote and the output of every leg.

Seeing the three outputs side by side made it easier to notice whether one leg was materially changing the overall result.